The enduring appeal of vintage dive watches is undeniable. Among the most sought-after are the Rolex Submariner 1680 and the Tudor Submariner 79090. Often compared, these timepieces share a lineage and a similar aesthetic, leading many to believe they are virtually identical. However, a closer examination reveals subtle yet significant differences, extending beyond mere superficial similarities. This article will delve into a detailed comparison of the Tudor 79090 and the Rolex 1680, addressing common misconceptions and highlighting their unique characteristics.
Is the Tudor Submariner 79090 the equivalent to the Rolex 1680?
The short answer is no, despite the superficial resemblance. While the Tudor 79090 was undeniably inspired by the Rolex 1680 and served as a more accessible alternative, it's crucial to understand the distinctions in their design, construction, and overall quality. The Rolex 1680, produced from 1966 to 1979, represents a significant milestone in Rolex's history, embodying the brand's commitment to precision and durability. The Tudor 79090, manufactured during a similar period, benefited from Rolex's expertise but utilized different materials and manufacturing processes, resulting in a watch that, while undeniably attractive and robust, occupies a different segment of the market.
The primary difference lies in the perceived (and often real) difference in quality of materials and manufacturing. Rolex, at the time, used higher-grade materials and stricter quality control measures, resulting in a generally more durable and refined product. This is reflected in the longevity and collectability of the 1680 compared to the 79090. While the 79090 is a highly capable and desirable watch in its own right, it generally commands a lower price, reflecting this difference in perceived value.
Furthermore, the movements within each watch differ significantly. The Rolex 1680 typically houses the calibre 1570 or 1575, known for their robustness and accuracy. The Tudor 79090, on the other hand, usually features the ETA 2483 movement or a modified version thereof. While the ETA 2483 is a reliable workhorse movement, it lacks the prestige and perceived refinement of the Rolex calibres. This difference in movement contributes to the overall distinction between the two watches.
1680 and 79090: Case Dimensions and Bezel Construction
The initial premise – that the Tudor 79090 and Rolex 1680 have identical case dimensions and bezel construction – is largely inaccurate. While visually similar, subtle variations exist. The case size might appear similar at first glance, but closer inspection reveals minor discrepancies in lug-to-lug distance, case thickness, and overall proportions. These variations, while small, contribute to the distinct feel and wearability of each watch.
The bezel construction also differs. While both watches feature rotating bezels, the materials and manufacturing techniques used vary. The Rolex 1680 generally boasts a more robust and precisely engineered bezel, often made from higher-grade materials. The Tudor 79090 bezel, while functional and durable, might exhibit slightly less precision in its construction and feel. The click action, the sharpness of the numerals, and the overall resistance to wear and tear can all be noticeably different between the two.
current url：https://pradri.h534a.com/global/tudor-79090-vs-rolex-1680-9298